Problems with using criteria for casual inference
(Adapted from "Epidemiology, An Introduction", Kenneth Rothman, 2002)
| Criterion | Problems with the Criterion | 
|---|---|
| Strength | Strength depends on the prevalence of other causes of disease present in the population, and therefore is not a biologic characteristic. | 
| Consistency | There are plausible reasons for not seeing consistent results, and these exceptions are best seen with hindsight. | 
| Specificity | A cause can have many effects. | 
| Temporality | Although this is thought to be the only true causal criterion, it can be difficult to establish. | 
| Biologic gradient | A relationship between and exposure and outcome that has a threshold would not show a progressive effect. | 
| Plausibility | Too subjective. | 
| Coherence | Vague and very similar to plausibility. | 
| Experimental evidence | Not always available or feasible. | 
| Analogy | Analogies abound. |